The debate on Lucentis and Avastin

For those 200,000 AMD patients within an averagediscrepancy. Even if Medicare and other health
year in US, the most effective treatment thatinsurance plans offset parts of the Lucentis expense, it
approved by FDA is Lucentis. It brings hope to wetis still much more expensive than Avastin. For
AMD patients by stopping and sometimes reversingexample, patients with Medicare may only need to pay
vision loss, which is a huge breakthrough. Yet anothera 20% of co-payment for Lucentis, which equals about
drug that is similar to Lucentis is also under wide$400.
discussion, which is named Avastin. But Avastin isGenentech has given explanations about its different
much cheaper than Lucentis, so that many doctorspolicies of the two drugs. Genentech officials say that
recommend Avastin for low-income individuals.the high price of Lucentis comes from its special
However, Avastin has not received FDA approval fordevelopment and its considerable expense of clinical
ophthalmic uses. Based on safety issues, Genentechtrials. Lucentis is administered in the form of smaller
also restricts the sale of Avastin to compoundingmolecules, which are more effective in controlling
pharmacies for ocular uses. Both Lucentis and Avastinabnormal blood vessels. The company also claims that
are owned by this company. Since the FDA hasthey will not conduct new trials for Avastin, since
expressed no concern about the Avastin’s offLucentis has already got FDA approval and is a
label uses for AMD, many eye doctors argue thatpromising AMD solution. The good news may be that
Genentech should allow Avastin to be directly sold tothe US government is likely to fund the comparison
both physicians and compounding pharmacies. If onlybetween Lucentis and Avastin.
physicians have access to Avastin, doctors at theWhile the initial use of Avastin for colon and other
American Academy of Ophthalmology protest thatcancers was reported to arouse risks of stroke and
many lower income people will be deprived of thisheart attack, its use for macular degeneration has
sight-saving drug. The fact is that Lucentis cost anbrought no negative side effects. Most of the doctors
average of $2,000, while Avastin only needs $150.are positive about the Avastin’s long-term safety
During the widely off-label uses of Avastin, thisrisks. Due to its low price, researchers encourage the
treatment has not been proved to be as effective asuse of Avastin. There are also concerns that Avastin
Lucentis, or even more effective. No clinical study hasmay be unable to penetrate the eye’s retina
made a comparison between the two AMDeffectively. The undergoing two-year NEI clinical trails
treatments. The most concern is their pricemay settle down all these controversies.