Understand the Agendas and Biases in Health Information

Writers of medical advice--including columnists,publications and web-pages is backed by their
insurance companies, governmental agencies, medicalreputations, which they zealously protect. So you can
organizations, drug companies and evenbe sure that the medical content is subjected to
practitioners--are all biased. They always haverigorous quality-control. And fortunately, although their
agendas. They all choose to write about certain topicsmessages are motivated by commercial needs, the
and not others. They make choices about what tolinkages are obvious and easy for the consumer to
include in their articles, what to leave out and how totake into account.
state their cases. They're all self-serving. They all haveHow about individual health practitioners? Giving advice
something to "sell," even when there is not anis what they do for a living, so what's the issue? Well,
immediate cash-return.in the U.S., at least, there is a genuine "medical
Does that mean you should throw up your hands, saymarketplace" where competition reigns supreme. So
the hell with it, and never read or listen to anotherwhen you need help with your health, each practitioner
medical message? I don't think so, but in order to(including me!) would like to make the short-list of
derive value from these messages, you sure as heckadvisers whose opinions you trust and value.
better understand the agendas of the people whoLet's move on to the drug companies. In my opinion
created them. Or as the psychologists say, if you wantthere is no medical information that is both as
to understand a behavior, you need to figure out whatpervasive and biased as that created by drug
motivated it. Let's examine some advice-givers andcompanies. And in many cases the connection
their biases.between the message and the drug company's name
What motivates health columnists? Well, how abouthas been obscured or hidden, so the consumer doesn't
their continued employment, the needs of theireven know to be wary.
publisher-employers, and the needs of the companiesI have written elsewhere about the comical turn of
the publishers wish to attract as advertisers? It's notevents in the "advice" that drug companies have
hard to imagine there are some subtle andprovided to people with headaches. For many years
not-so-subtle influences and incentives at play inthe makers of sinus medications invested heavily in
framing the subject-matter and slant of the articles.convincing people with headaches that most of them
Certainly, it's hard to attract the business of potentialwere due to sinus disease. But now that effective and
advertisers when you have written devastatinglucrative drugs for migraine exist, companies are
critiques of their products.sinking even larger sums of money into the message
Yet don't infer that you should ignore what the healththat those headaches weren't due to sinus conditions
columnists have to say. They provide a wonderfulafter all. Instead, they've been due to migraine. This
service in discussing health issues, the business ofvignette illustrates the hazard in allowing marketing
medicine and its practice. I personally enjoy reading thedepartments of drug companies to diagnose one's
health columns of that great medical publication, Theheadaches.
Wall Street Journal. In fact, I still distribute to myAnother hazard is in allowing drug companies to write
patients an excellent article about medication-overusethe information-sheets that doctors hand patients at
headaches that Tara Parker-Pope, one of theirthe ends of office visits. Every doctor gets buried in
columnists, wrote years ago.pamphlets that sales reps from drug companies leave
One of the odder chapters in the business of medicineat their offices. For years I actually looked at these
is that certain insurance companies have positionedthings, trying to select the 30% that might be worth
themselves as providers of health advice, particularlyretaining and passing along to my patients. After a
those companies paid by employers to manage theirwhile, 30% seemed too optimistic, so I searched for
medication-benefit plans. I won't waste the reader'sthe 20% that was worth keeping, and then the
time in building a case that insurance companies have10%...well, you get the idea. The pamphlets kept getting
agendas and conflicts-of-interest in providing suchmore biased and less useful. At one time the sales
advice. This should be self-evident.reps passed out some real gems that were genuinely
Governmental agencies like the National Institutes ofhelpful to patients and their families. But those days are
Health provide medical information which is generallygone.
reliable and useful, but influenced by the agency'sSo when it comes to medical advice, consider the
understandable needs for self-promotion andsource.
self-preservation. The same holds true for medical(C) 2005 by Gary Cordingley
organizations like the American Academy ofWant to find out about breast lift without implants and
Neurology (to which I belong) and big group-practicestransumbilical breast augmentation? Get tips from the
like the Mayo Clinic and Cleveland Clinic. The adviceBreast Discomfort website.
tendered by these medical organizations in their