Ask the doctor


halsteadhospital.com keyword stats



Most current MSN search phrases:

"parakeet illness"  

The Wages of Science

In the United States, Congress approved, lastand foundations.Moreover, the conduits of
month, increases in the 2003 budgets of bothgovernment involvement in research, the
the National Institutes of Health anduniversities, are only weakly correlated with
National Science Foundation. America is notgrowing prosperity. As Alison Wolf, professor
alone in - vainly - trying to compensate forof education at the University of London
imploding capital markets and risk-averseelucidates in her seminal tome "Does
financiers.In 1999, chancellor Gordon BrownEducation Matter? Myths about Education and
inaugurated a $1.6 billion program ofEconomic Growth", published last year, extra
"upgrading British science" andyears of schooling and wider access to
commercializing its products. This was on topuniversity do not necessarily translate to
of $1 billion invested between 1998-2002. Theenhanced growth (though technological
budgets of the Medical Research Council andinnovation clearly does).Terence Kealey, a
the Biotechnology and Biological Sciencesclinical biochemist, vice-chancellor of the
Research Council were quadrupledUniversity of Buckingham in England and
overnight.The University Challenge Fund wasauthor of "The Economic Laws of Scientific
set to provide $100 million in seed money toResearch", is one of a growing band of
cover costs related to the hiring ofscholars who dispute the intuitive linkage
managerial skills, securing intellectualbetween state-propped science and economic
property, constructing a prototype orprogress. In an interview published last week
preparing a business plan. Another $30by Scientific American, he recounted how he
million went to start-up funding ofdiscovered that:"Of all the lead industrial
high-tech, high-risk companies in thecountries, Japan - the country investing
UK.According to the United Nationsleast in science - was growing fastest.
Development Programme (UNDP), the top 29Japanese science grew spectacularly under
industrialized nations invest in R&D morelaissez-faire. Its science was actually purer
than $600 billion a year. The bulk of thisthan that of the U.K. or the U.S. The
capital is provided by the private sector. Incountries with the next least investment were
the United Kingdom, for instance, governmentFrance and Germany, and were growing next
funds are dwarfed by private financing,fastest. And the countries with the maximum
according to the British Venture Capitalinvestment were the U.S., Canada and U.K.,
Association. More than $80 billion have beenall of which were doing very badly at the
ploughed into 23,000 companies since 1983,time."The Economist concurs: "it is hard for
about half of them in the hi-tech sector.governments to pick winners in technology."
Three million people are employed in theseInnovation and science sprout in - or migrate
firms. Investments surged by 36 percent into - locations with tough laws regarding
2001 to $18 billion.But this Britishintellectual property rights, a functioning
exuberance is a global exception.Even the -financial system, a culture of "thinking
white hot - life sciences field suffered anoutside the box" and a tradition of
11 percent drop in venture capitalexcellence.Government can only remove
investments last year, reports the MoneyTreeobstacles - especially red tape and trade
Survey. According to the Ernst & Young 2002tariffs - and nudge things in the right
Alberta Technology Report released ondirection by investing in infrastructure and
Wednesday, the Canadian hi-tech sector isinstitutions. Tax incentives are essential
languishing with less than $3 billioninitially. But if the authorities meddle,
invested in 2002 in seed capital - thisthey are bound to ruin science and be rued by
despite generous matching funds and taxscientists.Still, all forms of science
credits proffered by many of the provinces asfunding - both public and private - are
well as the federal government.In Israel,lacking.State largesse is ideologically
venture capital plunged to $600 million lastconstrained, oft-misallocated, inefficient
year - one fifth its level in 2000. Aware ofand erratic. In the United States, mega
this cataclysmic reversal in investorprojects, such as the Superconducting Super
sentiment, the Israeli government set up 24Collider, with billions already sunk in, have
hi-tech incubators. But these are able merelybeen abruptly discontinued as were numerous
to partly cater to the pecuniary needs ofother defense-related schemes. Additionally,
less than 20 percent of the projectssome knowledge gleaned in government-funded
submitted.As governments pick up theresearch is barred from the public domain.But
monumental slack created by the withdrawal ofindustrial money can be worse. It comes with
private funding, they attempt to rationalizestrings attached. The commercially
and economize.The New Jersey Commission ofdetrimental results of drug studies have been
Health Science Education and Trainingsuppressed by corporate donors on more than
recently proposed to merge the state's threeone occasion, for instance. Commercial
public research universities. Soaring federalentities are unlikely to support basic
and state budget deficits are likely to exertresearch as a public good, ultimately made
added pressure on the already strainedavailable to their competitors as a
relationship between academe and state -"spillover benefit". This understandable
especially with regards to researchreluctance stifles innovation.There is no
priorities and the allocation of ever-scarcerlack of suggestions on how to square this
resources.This friction is inevitable becausecircle.Quoted in the Philadelphia Business
the interaction between technology andJournal, Donald Drakeman, CEO of the
science is complex and ill-understood. SomePrinceton biotech company Medarex, proposed
technological advances spawn new scientificlast month to encourage pharmaceutical
fields - the steel industry gave birth tocompanies to shed technologies they have
metallurgy, computers to computer science andchosen to shelve: "Just like you see little
the transistor to solid state physics. Thecompanies coming out of the research being
discoveries of science also lead, thoughconducted at Harvard and MIT in Massachusetts
usually circuitously, to technologicaland Stanford and Berkley in California, we
breakthroughs - consider the examples ofcould do it out of Johnson & Johnson and
semiconductors and biotechnology.Thus, it isMerck."This would be the corporate equivalent
safe to generalize and say that theof the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980. The statute
technology sector is only the more visiblemade both academic institutions and
and alluring tip of the drabber iceberg ofresearchers the owners of inventions or
research and development. The military,discoveries financed by government agencies.
universities, institutes and industry allThis unleashed a wave of unprecedented
over the world plough hundreds of billionsself-financing entrepreneurship.In the two
annually into both basic and applied studies.decades that followed, the number of patents
But governments are the most importantregistered to universities increased tenfold
sponsors of pure scientific pursuits by aand they spun off more than 2200 firms to
long shot.Science is widely perceived as acommercialize the fruits of research. In the
public good - its benefits are shared.process, they generated $40 billion in gross
Rational individuals would do well to sitnational product and created 260,000
back and copy the outcomes of research -jobs.None of this was government financed -
rather than produce widely replicatedthough, according to The Economist's
discoveries themselves. The government has toTechnology Quarterly, $1 in research usually
step in to provide them with incentives torequires up to $10,000 in capital to get to
innovate.Thus, in the minds of most laymenmarket. This suggests a clear and mutually
and many economists, science is associatedprofitable division of labor - governments
exclusively with publicly-funded universitiesshould picks up the tab for basic research,
and the defense establishment. Inventionsprivate capital should do the rest,
such as the jet aircraft and the Internet arestimulated by the transfer of intellectual
often touted as examples of the civilianproperty from state to entrepreneurs.But this
benefits of publicly funded militaryraises a host of contentious issues.Such a
research. The pharmaceutical, biomedical,scheme may condition industry to depend on
information technology and space industries,the state for advances in pure science, as a
for instance - though largely private - relykind of hidden subsidy. Research priorities
heavily on the fruits of nonrivalrous (i.e.are bound to be politicized and lead to
public domain) science sponsored by themassive misallocation of scarce economic
state.The majority of 501 corporationsresources through pork barrel politics and
surveyed by the Department of Finance andthe imposition of "national goals". NASA,
Revenue Canada in 1995-6 reported thatwith its "let's put a man on the moon (before
government funding improved their internalthe Soviets do)" and the inane International
cash flow - an important consideration in theSpace Station is a sad manifestation of such
decision to undertake research anddangers.Science is the only public good that
development. Most beneficiaries claimed theis produced by individuals rather than
tax incentives for seven years and recordedcollectives. This inner conflict is difficult
employment growth.In the absence of efficientto resolve. On the one hand, why should the
capital markets and adventuresomepublic purse enrich entrepreneurs? On the
capitalists, some developing countries haveother hand, profit-driven investors seek
taken this propensity to extremes. In thetemporary monopolies in the form of
Philippines, close to 100 percent of all R&Dintellectual property rights. Why would they
is government-financed. The meltdown ofshare this cornucopia with others, as pure
foreign direct investment flows - theyscientists are compelled to do?The
declined by nearly three fifths since 2000 -partnership between basic research and
only rendered state involvement moreapplied science has always been an uneasy
indispensable.But this is not a universalone. It has grown more so as monetary returns
trend. South Korea, for instance, effected aon scientific insight have soared and as
successful transition to private venturecapital available for commercialization
capital which now - even after the Asianmultiplied. The future of science itself is
turmoil of 1997 and the global downturn ofat stake.Were governments to exit the field,
2001 - amounts to four fifths of all spendingbasic research would likely crumble. Were
on R&D.Thus, supporting ubiquitous governmentthey to micromanage it - applied science and
entanglement in science is overdoing it. Mostentrepreneurship would suffer. It is a fine
applied R&D is still conducted by privatelybalancing act and, judging by the state of
owned industrial outfits. Even "pure" scienceboth universities and startups, a precarious
- unadulterated by greed and commerce - isone as well.
sometimes bankrolled by private endowments



1 A B C D E F 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136