Latest California Small Group Health Insurance Strategies

What are some the latest Strategies being used bySection 105.
Small Business owners in California to make their4. Kaiser.
group health insurance premiums more efficient?More and more groups are moving to Kaiser. It is
1. Health Savings Accounts (HSA)typically, benefit for benefit, less money than just about
This is a strategy where the employer buys a healthevery other plan. Kaiser is spending billions on the
plan with a large deductible. Typically, these are groupsfuture and their quality control is promising.
that are coming from a plan with a very low5. Offering Blue Cross and Kaiser side by side. Blue
deductible. Since the higher deductible plans are usuallyCross has a new program where only five employees
much less money, the money saved is used to put intoneed to enroll with Blue Cross. The rest can be with
the employee's "Health Savings Account." The moneyKaiser. This is a ground breaking opportunity in flexibility.
in this account is used by the employee to pay6. Blue Cross Elect. Blue Cross has a portfolio called
qualified medical expenses. If it's not used, the moneyElect with 16 plans in it comprised of HMOs, PPOs, and
rolls over to the next year. The money belongs to thean EPO plan. Each of these plans is priced from low
employee, even if they leave the company.premiums up to a much higher premium.
2. Health Reimbursement Arrangements (HRA)The beauty of this program is that Blue Cross allows
This is very similar to the HSA above but a portion ofthe employer to "define" how much premium they are
the qualified medical expenses not covered by thewilling to pay towards an employee's cost. For
insurance is "pledged" by the employer, that is, theexample, Blue Cross offers a $10, $20, $25, $30, $35,
employer only spends the money, if there is a portionand a $40 copay PPO plan. The $10 plan is the most
of the bill not paid by the insurance. This would beexpensive of this group.
more favorable to the employer since on an HSA theAfter viewing all of the premiums for the various plans,
money goes to the employee, whether there arethe employer can establish, arbitrarily, which plan they
claims or not. The problem with HRAs is that there areare willing to pay, say the employee only premium for.
very few carriers that offer them right now.In this case, let's say it's the $25 copay plan. The
3. Medical Reimbursement Accountsemployee can buy the $25 copay plan and it doesn't
This is very similar to HRAs above and extremelycost them anything. However, if they want the more
flexible. It's otherwise known as partial self-funding.expensive $10 copay plan, the employer would payroll
Employer buys a larger deductible and if the employeededuct the difference in premium costs.
uses up that deductible, the employer pays all or aLet's say they have dependents they want to cover
portion of it, depending on how a pre-arrangedbut the employer only wants to pay for the employee
agreement is written. This goes for other expensesonly. The employee could take the lesser expensive
not paid by the insurance. The idea is that the$40 copay plan, and use a little bit of the savings to
employer self insures the typically smaller expenseshelp them with the costs of adding their dependents.
with their own cash, (presumably, the savings inThis has been a highly successful program because it
premium dollars from going to a higher deductible.) Thegives the employees a greater number of choices,
downside to this is that many carriers prohibit the usehelping the employees be more definitive in their costs
of this strategy with their plans. It can be veryand needs, and at the same time, allows the employer
effective but make sure you use an experienced thirdto more efficiently define their costs.
party administrator as there may be some legal andThis information is time sensitive and can change at
tax documentation required. Otherwise known asanytime.