San Diego DUI Lawyer Finds Dishonesty in DUI CaseTestimony

When it comes to court time, the prosecution (police orand found it to be a strict instruction list on how to
sheriff's department) will often use evidence from theiranswer. The instructions explained to the witness on
key witness in the crime lab. The expert that provideswhat to say verbatim, not what their experience was
evidence of toxicology is the crime lab's blood-alcoholor anything that they knew unique to the case.
expert. These key witnesses, often called forensicIf fact some of the questions where basically saying to
toxicologists, will often go to the stand and describeplay dumb and state that "it's impossible to remember
what amount of alcohol was found in the blood, whateach blood draw." This was the prosecutions method
is done to find this level while describing the steps inof putting away DUI cases without a matter of a
laymen's terms. They are probably the singe mostdoubt simply to make their toxicologist follow along a
important witness, because they back up the evidenceset of guidelines on what to do rather than what they
of blood alcohol levels -- something that a breathalyzerknow happened during testing -- a true conflict and a
may not do 100 percent of the time.pretty blatant case of dishonesty.
The honesty of all those in the chain of evidenceAnother 'Expert Witness' Gone Wrong
gathering at the police department is important to theAnother toxicologist was found, not to have been
case at hand, but recently a San Diego DUI lawyergiving testimony with scripted lines, but scripting a false
found the toxicologist's testimony odd since most ofresume instead. During an employee record audit at
his account seem to come from a paper he wasthe San Diego Sheriff Department's Crime lab, it was
referring to during questioning.found that an often used key witness, Raymond Cole,
Afterwards, San Diego attorney Cole Caseyhad falsified his resume. It was found that Cole's
approached the toxicologist and asked him what heresume states that instead of graduating from
was reading during the testimony. To his surprise theBerkeley in pre-med, he had actually graduated with a
witness showed him the paper he was referencingbachelor's in political science.